If you’re shopping for a new desktop processor in late 2024, you’re probably wondering what to choose: AMD or Intel? Is Ryzen better than Intel, or does Intel still make better processors? In the Intel vs. AMD competition, the winner is seldom easy to tell, especially for gaming. Both brands offer a large range of processors, some high-end and powerful, others more budget-friendly. So what are the pros and cons of AMD vs. Intel? To help you out, I decided to update my AMD vs. Intel comparison. Read on and see what aspects you should take into consideration when comparing the latest Ryzen and Intel Core processors in 2024:
AMD vs Intel
All that leads to a series of benefits and disadvantages for both AMD’s Ryzen processors and their Intel counterparts:
Is AMD Ryzen better than Intel?
Intel’s hybrid architecture delivers incredible performance. The Raptor Lake processors can deliver up to 15% more single-thread performance and up to 41% more multi-thread performance than the previous CPUs. On a trip down memory lane, it’s interesting to remember that the old Alder Lake lineup featured a similar 19% increase in instructions per cycle/clock compared to previous Intel processors. The 14th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake Refresh) series is a minor update to Raptor Lake, using the same hybrid architecture but with slightly higher clock speeds and a bit lower power consumption.
Here’s a table I compiled with AMD’s current processor lineup (Autumn 2024), their technical specifications, and retail prices:
AMD Ryzen 7000, 8000 & 9000 series CPUs specs, features, and prices
Regarding cache memory, the 5 and 4-nm lithographies allow AMD to bundle more of it on its Ryzen processors than Intel can. Throughout the AMD Ryzen 7000, 8000, and 9000 lineups, we get between 8 to 64 MB of Level 3 cache memory. Even more on the “3D special” processors designed for gaming performance, where AMD uses 3D V-Cache in amounts of 96 or 128 MB! Intel is behind in this regard, with its Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake Refresh CPUs getting only 12 to 36 MB of Smart Cache memory.
Is Intel better than AMD?
AMD’s Ryzen 8000 series lags behind with support only for PCI Express 4. However, most of the Ryzen 8000 processors are APUs (accelerated processing units) that include both traditional CPU cores and advanced integrated graphics. Except for the Ryzen 5 8400F and the Ryzen 7 8700F, which don’t have integrated graphics, the other Ryzen 8000 processors are designed to work without a discrete GPU and have enough power to run AAA games in 1080p resolutions on their own. The Ryzen 8000 processors don’t really need PCIe 5 for that. However, it would’ve been nice to be able to use fast PCIe 5.0 solid-state drives with them.
Regarding memory support, on the one hand, all Intel’s 13th Gen and 14th Gen Core processors support DDR4 RAM running at 3200 MHz. All of them can use DDR5-4800 as well, and higher-end models also offer support for DDR5-5600. Pay attention, however: you’ll have to choose the right motherboard right from the start, as you can only use one type of RAM on any given motherboard. There are some designed for DDR4, and then there are others meant for DDR5.
On the other hand, AMD’s Ryzen 9000, 7000, and Ryzen 8000 processors only work with DDR5, meaning you’ll need a motherboard and DDR5 memory to accompany any such processor.
Take a look at the table below to see what Intel’s 13 and 14 Gen Core processors offer and what their real prices are today:
Gen 13 & 14 Intel Core processors specs, features, and prices
Last but not least, when it comes to integrated graphics, both Intel Core and AMD Ryzen processors have built-in GPUs. With Intel, it depends on the exact CPU model you’re looking at. It’s easier with AMD: almost all Ryzen 9000, 8000, and 7000 processors have integrated graphics chips, except for the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, the Ryzen 5 8400F, and the Ryzen 7 8700F.
The integrated graphics options available on AMD Ryzen 9000, Ryzen 7000 and some of Intel’s 13 and 14th-gen Core desktop processors are pretty basic. They can be handy in some computer configurations built for office work but not much else.
The graphics chips built into the AMD Ryzen 8000 processors are another matter, though. As I briefly mentioned earlier, the integrated graphics on these AMD CPUs are quite powerful - significantly more powerful than what you get on other AMD Ryzen or Intel Core models. The AMD Ryzen 8000 processors can run most AAA games at 1080p resolution, although they may sometimes require lower-quality settings. While they’re not designed to compete with or replace dedicated graphics cards, they are undoubtedly the best option on the market for iGPU gaming.
In conclusion, if you want to future-proof your computer, you’ll be better prepared with an AMD Ryzen 9000, as that gives you DDR5 support and PCIe 5.0 for your GPU and SSDs. A 13th or 14th-generation Intel Core CPU will give you the same benefits, except that your SSD slot(s) will be limited to PCIe 4.0.
If you need to keep your budget in check, you might want to get an AMD Ryzen 8000 CPU or an Intel Core processor from the 12th or 13th generation. The former lets you play games without having to buy a discrete GPU, while the latter allows you to save some money by using DDR4 memory.
AMD vs. Intel processors: Manufacturing process, heat, and power consumption
Both AMD and Intel have capable processors; there’s no question about it. However, when it comes to specs, there are some differences between them. While Intel was almost always first in technological advances in the past, AMD has been overshadowing it in the last couple of years, and both companies seem equally advanced today. One key factor determining a processor’s performance and efficiency is the manufacturing process, also known as lithography or the node. This refers to the size of the processor’s transistors, measured in nanometers (nm). The smaller the transistors, the more they can fit on a chip, resulting in higher performance and lower power consumption. AMD has been ahead of Intel in this aspect for several years, thanks to its partnership with TSMC, a leading semiconductor foundry. AMD’s latest Zen 4 CPUs (Ryzen 7000 and Ryzen 8000 series) use 5 and 4-nanometer manufacturing processes. This allows them to pack more cores and cache, as well as features like 3D stacking technology (X3D) that boost performance even further. AMD’s Ryzen 9000 Series continues this collaboration (with TSMC), using 4-nanometer lithography in its Zen 5 architecture. This manufacturing process allows AMD to pack more transistors on the chip, improving both performance and efficiency. AMD’s Ryzen 9000 series builds on the energy efficiency that the Ryzen 7000 series is already known for, making it a leader in power consumption and thermals, particularly in multi-core workloads. On the other hand, Intel has been struggling with its manufacturing process, which has caused delays and setbacks for its products. Therefore, Intel still uses a 10-nanometer process for its 13th and 14th Gen Core processors. However, the company tweaked its CPUs, which use a hybrid architecture with two types of cores: high-performance and power-efficient, similar to smartphone processors. Thanks to this approach, many of Intel’s latest processors can match or, in certain cases, even outmatch AMD’s models.
- Thanks to the smaller manufacturing process, Ryzen CPUs have an increased density of transistors per mm². Therefore, AMD processors are typically more power-efficient and cooler (lower TDP) than similar Intel processors.
- Despite improvements in their hybrid design, Intel processors still tend to consume more power and generate more heat than AMD processors.
AMD vs. Intel processors: Performance
Intel has a tradition of delivering desktop processors with incredible single-core speeds, and that’s still true for the 13th Gen and especially the 14th Gen Core lineup. Many of these Intel processors can run at speeds higher than 5.0 GHz, and some reach the 6.0 GHz threshold! The fastest of the bunch are the Intel Core i9-14900K, i9-14900KF, and i9-13900KS, all of which can boost to 6.0 GHz! However, AMD’s processors are not far behind either, reaching almost similar single-core speeds and performance. All Ryzen 9000 processors and most of the Ryzen 7000 and Ryzen 8000 launched thus far feature maximum turbo speeds of over 5.0 GHz! The most powerful are the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and all of them can run at a maximum speed of 5.70 GHz! The Zen 5 and Zen 4 architectures make the Ryzen 9000, 8000, 7000 series processors capable of delivering higher boost clocks than ever before. Looking back to the past, Ryzen 5000 CPUs promised and offered up to 19% more IPC (instructions per cycle/clock) than previous Zen 2 Ryzen 3000 processors, plus lower cache latency. The Zen 4 architecture used for Ryzen 7000 and 8000 CPUs brings an approximate 13% IPC uplift over predecessors and up to 29% higher single-thread performance! Furthermore, the Zen 5 architecture used to create the Ryzen 9000 series brings another 16% IPC uplift (on average) over its predecessors.

AMD vs. Intel processors: Features
All the AMD Ryzen 9000 (Zen 5) and 7000 (Zen 4) desktop processors fully support PCI Express 5.0! As all their lanes are PCIe 5, they have a lot of bandwidth available for both the discrete graphics card and all the other components using this interface, such as M.2 NVMe solid-state drives! Intel’s Gen 13 and Gen 14 Core processors also support PCI Express 5.0, but only for the x16 graphics port. These CPUs give you the best performance possible from present and future high-end graphics cards that are PCIe 5-compatible. However, the other PCIe lanes are limited to version 4.0, including those that go to the M.2 slots where you connect your SSDs.




Discussion (9)
In working with computers for more than 25 years now, I was there when AMD surpassed Intel in the speed department. Also, since the AMD processors were generally cheaper I chose to go that route for all my builds from that point on.
That being said, over the last few years I have made the switch to Intel simply because they are more stable and the speed, as you have pointed out, is close enough to become a mute point.
I’ve found that using Intel processors with motherboards that are based on Intel chipsets are far more stable than the AMD based builds and give far fewer problems with drivers and firmware.
As for the graphics cards, I’ve run both but going back to stability, I have always preferred an NVIDIA based graphics cards based on that same stability factor.
Just my opinion!!!
Thanks for sharing your perspective. 😀
It’s harder to find an AMD motherboard computer for sure. I’ll have to get a custom build or settle for the Intel versions. I have an older hp envy desktop with the amd processor. The newer envy versions I’ve seen are all Intel models. Nothing against Intel. However, we all have our preferences
This article and data tables give a good overview of the actual CPU Segment.
Choosing AMD over Intel or vice versa depends on the size of the desktop where the chassis is to put at.
A Threadripper Pro 5xxx with 280Watts TDP will not fit in to a small size Box. A i7 will fit perfectly in example a NUC 11/12Pro Box and will work quietly.
Also is to find the right use case. Do I Need the crown CPU Performance 24*365 over the year and do I want to pay the Power bill.
I have Chosen a Intel NUC11Pro i7 11700B and have a lot of power now .
Thank you for sharing your perspective.
Intel cpu have been using sky-lake design(2014) for there core. Intel has just shrunk it’s design and made minor or clock speed increases. Intel has better clock speed, but needs a very expensive cooler just to keep the heat in check. AMD Ryzen cores does more work per cycle than the Intel cores. Intel’s 10 nm node is broke and 7nm has been delayed until late 2021 or even early 2022.
I am totally agree with when compare between the two CPUs company. I don’t trust Intel CPU more after incidents with Meltdown and Spectre and others. They cover up the indidents and worked with MS to fix the issue. Intel tried to cut corner to gain speed over AMD. For me, security in the CPU is very important.
Is there more useful information beyond the last column displayed in the comparison spreadsheet? It looks like it’s wider than is shown.
You can open it full-size. See the options on its toolbar on the bottom of the embed.